• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

CARNM

Commercial Association of REALTORS® - CARNM New Mexico

  • Property Search
    • Search Properties
      • For Sale
      • For Lease
      • For Sale or Lease
      • Start Your Search
    • Location & Type
      • Albuquerque
      • Rio Rancho
      • Las Cruces
      • Santa Fe
      • Industry Types
  • Members
    • New Member
      • About Us
      • Getting Started in Commercial
      • Join CARNM
      • Orientation
    • Resources
      • Find A Broker
      • Code of Ethics
      • Governing Documents
      • NMAR Forms
      • CARNM Forms
      • RPAC
      • Needs & Wants
      • CARNM Directory
      • REALTOR® Benefits
      • Foreign Broker Violation
    • Designations
      • CCIM
      • IREM
      • SIOR
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • About
    • About
      • About Us
      • Join CARNM
      • Sponsors
      • Contact Us
    • People
      • 2026 Board Members
      • Past Presidents
      • REALTORS® of the Year
      • President’s Award Recipients
      • Founder’s Award Recipients
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • Education
    • Courses
      • Register
      • All Education
    • Resources
      • NMREC Licensing
      • Code of Ethics
      • NAR Educational Opportunities
      • CCIM Education
      • IREM Education
      • SIOR Educuation
  • News & Events
    • News
      • All News
      • Market Trends
    • Events
      • All Events Calendar
      • Education
      • CCIM Events
      • LIN Marketing Meeting
      • Thank Yous
  • CARNM Login
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Archives for 2014

Multifamily Sector Embraces Green Movement

December 15, 2014 by mcarristo

Staying current on incentives and programs available to multifamily owners and developers keeps real estate pros better positioned to discuss and market such properties.

Green isn’t just for single-family home owners anymore. Environmentally friendly properties are gaining favor among both tenants and property owners in the multifamily sector.
“Green buildings are seen by many as a better asset,” says David Newcombe, designated broker of Habitat Urban Agents in Phoenix. “The green concept will continue to be a stamp of approval, not just for the environmental benefits, but for the quality of the building.”
The initial push for green buildings — those that have a minimal impact on the environment — began in the early 1990s, propelled by the introduction of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Energy Star program and the creation of the U.S. Green Building Council. Soon technological advances created better ways to reduce energy consumption, and terms like “sustainable” and “high performance” became a more common element of a property’s description.
With the larger occupancy rate of multifamily buildings expending more energy per square foot than single-family homes, these structures have been the focus of recent energy conservation incentives and certification programs, giving real estate professionals and property owners new ways to compare and assess properties.
Energy Star for Multifamily
The Energy Star designation, created in 1992 by the EPA, has become synonymous with appliances and materials that are highly energy-efficient. Recognizing that multifamily property owners needed a way to understand and compare the performance of their buildings, Fannie Mae Multifamily Mortgage Business partnered with the EPA to create Energy Star for multifamily properties, introduced in September of 2014.
Newcombe says this is a huge step forward for multifamily customers, property managers, and developers.
“People are familiar with the concept of Energy Star; there’s a public understanding already in place,” he says.
To obtain a score, property owners submit data to the EPA’s Portfolio Manager, a free online tool for measuring and comparing buildings’ energy use. The resulting number, from 1 to 100, ranks a building’s performance in comparison with others; for example, a score of 70 indicates that the building performs better than 70 percent of similar properties.
Multifamily properties scoring over 75 qualify for Energy Star certification. Overall, certified buildings use approximately 35 percent less energy and emit 35 percent fewer greenhouse gases than standard buildings.
LEED Certification
LEED, which stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, was created in 2000 by the U.S. Green Building Council. A building receives LEED points for energy- and water-saving features, as well as other factors such as innovative property management. The total number of points sets the certification level: certified, silver, gold, or platinum. Real estate professionals can then incorporate such language into their property descriptions.
“We’ve seen tremendous success in multifamilies with LEED certification,” says Asa Foss, a LEED residential technical director with the U.S. Green Building Council.
Multifamily low-rise buildings became eligible for certification under the LEED for Homes classification in 2008. With LEED v4, launched in November of 2013, multifamily mid-rises—up to 12 stories above grade—are also eligible, and upgraded standards apply to multifamily low-rise buildings.
“Certification is valuable if you’re marketing your building to a younger demographic, to whom environmental issues are important,” says Foss, adding that it can also be beneficial to property owners seeking financing. “Some larger lenders — who see certified buildings as better, safer investments — are starting to require LEED certification.”
Foss points to a recent study published by researchers at CoStar’s Property and Portfolio Research subsidiary for proof of the bottom-line benefits of certification. The study looked at a half-million data points about apartment buildings that drive investment value based on renter demand in the apartment sector. LEED certification was determined to be the second highest driver in lease rates, behind location.
Better Buildings Challenge
Another incentive igniting eco-friendly improvements to multifamily structures is the Better Buildings Challenge. Originally launched in 2011 by President Barack Obama and implemented through the U.S. Department of Energy, this program challenges commercial and industrial building owners to strive to make their properties at least 20 percent more energy efficient by 2020.
In 2013, the Department of Housing and Urban Development partnered with the DOE to expand the challenge to the multifamily sector. Participants in the challenge, referred to as partners, commit to reducing energy consumption by at least 20 percent over 10 years. Partners agree to publicly share their data on their energy savings and details about the efficiency strategies they employ.
Partners in the challenge are looked upon as energy-efficient role models in their community, and are recognized as part of a collaborative conservation effort. While the specifics vary by state, subsidized services and resources are available to support reduction goals.
Boston-based real estate developer WinnCompanies was a partner in the challenge in 2013.
“Joining the challenge has given us an opportunity to be a leader in both meeting — and going beyond — green building standards,” says Darien Crimmin, vice president of Energy and Sustainability at WinnCompanies. “Both renters and buyers are recognizing the trend toward more environmental building.”
Crimmin says the challenge has been beneficial, given the demographic shift in favor of environmentally sound buildings.
“It’s forced us to take a holistic look at our long-term energy efficiency strategy,” he reports. “Renters and buyers are recognizing that this is a priority.”
By: Debbie Swanson (REALTORMag)
Click here to view source article.

Filed Under: All News

Identifying Top Metro Areas Attractive to Baby Boomer Buyers

December 11, 2014 by mcarristo

Metro areas with a lower cost of living and sunnier weather are poised to see an increased number of Baby Boomers moving in and buying a home as some delay retirement and remain participants on the labor market.
NAR analyzed current population trends, housing affordability, cost of living, housing inventory and job market conditions in the 100 largest metropolitan statistical areas across the U.S. to determine housing markets most likely to see a boost in sales from Baby Boomers. State taxes and the share of expenditures for Public Welfare, Hospitals, Health, Police Protection, Parks and Recreation at the state level for those areas were also considered.
The top markets positioned to see an influx of baby boomer homebuyers are as follows:
-Albuquerque, New Mexico
-Boise, Idaho
-Denver
-Fort Myers, Florida
-Greenville, South Carolina
-Orlando, Florida
-Phoenix
-Raleigh, North Carolina
-Sarasota, Florida
-Tucson, Arizona
View the Full Release
Click on the tabs to follow the story below. Hover over the map for a snapshot of each metro area’s share. The following charts show the housing and job market conditions for the 10 most attractive metro areas for Baby Boomers compared to the average for the 100 largest metro areas.
Click here to view interactive maps in original article.
By: Nadia Evangelou (Economist’s Outlook)
Click here to view source article.

Filed Under: All News

25 Big Mistakes Made in CRE Investing

December 10, 2014 by mcarristo

WALNUT CREEK, CA— The CRE industry is different than all other industries in that it is a transaction based model. The lifeblood of the industry is dependent on sale, financing and lease transactions.
The most successful companies and individuals in the industry usually complete the most transactions. However, in pursing these transactions the same mistakes are made over and over again which usually results in poor performance, the loss of equity in a property or the loss of the property in foreclosure.
Below are 25 of the biggest mistakes in CRE investing that are the root cause of bad deals.
1. Buying properties at low cap rates.
2. Buying properties because the investment sponsor has idle cash to spend in a commingled or special account fund.
3. Not diversifying a national portfolio by property type, location and industry.
4. Not performing property level and financial due diligence on all properties in a portfolio acquisition.
5. Acquiring properties with negative leverage, i.e., the mortgage rate is greater than the cap rate.
6. Using short term debt to finance a long term real estate asset or portfolio.
7. In underwriting an acquisition, using a terminal cap rate that is less than the going in cap rate.
8. Institutional investors who commit capital to sponsors who have inexperienced senior management teams. The senior management team should have gray hair and been through the two secular CRE downturns of 1987-1992 and 2007-2012.
9. Using overly optimistic rent projections in underwriting a deal.
10. Not analyzing the corporate credit of major tenants.
11. Not analyzing the sales volumes of retail tenants, a key metric when buying shopping centers.
12. Performing shoddy engineering due diligence on an acquisition.
13. Not swapping or collaring floating rate debt.
14. Using high leverage of more than 75%.
15. Using convoluted capital stacks with first mortgage debt, multiple mezzanine loans, preferred equity and owner equity.
16. Not analyzing demographic, economic and social changes in the market.
17. Not hiring bright, hardworking and experienced personnel.
18. Not giving senior level employees an equity interest in the company, portfolio or fund.
19. Assuming real estate entrepreneurs are good corporate managers and capital allocators.
20. Not incorporating the 15 risks of CRE including; cash flow, value, tenant, market, economic, interest rate, inflation, leasing, management, ownership, legal and title, construction, entitlement, liquidity and refinancing into the firm’s investment strategy.
21. Investing in a property sector like hotels and senior housing in which the investment firm has no experience.
22. Not obtaining the Kmart discount when acquiring a portfolio of assets that are usually made up of a few queens, a lot of pigs and the rest in between.
23. Not understanding that hotels are 70% operating business and 30% real estate and senior housing is 80%-90% operating business and 10%-20% real estate and value is created by superior management and operational expertise.
24. Following the institutional herd in buying core real estate assets at low cap rates.
25. Not checking the formulas in an XL underwriting worksheet, as there is at least one formula error in every underwriting worksheet.
By: Joseph Ori (GlobeSt.com)
Click here to view source article.

Filed Under: All News

Dealmaking: Do the Different Thing in Transactions

December 10, 2014 by mcarristo

If honing your negotiation skills is one of your New Year’s resolutions, consider the suggestion by one trainer: Do the counterintuitive thing to help move the transaction along.
Trainer Mira Zaslove, in an expanded article at lifestyle site Lifehacker.com based on a discussion at Quora.com, suggests that negotiations can actually move more quickly and smoothly when one side takes actions that give the other side a narrower, but perhaps more appealing, range of options.
In fact, Zaslove’s first warning is against providing too many options. “The paradox of choice dictates that the more choices you provide to someone the more they like aspects of each option. Therefore, they over-think and believe they can find the perfect solution,” she explains. By providing a small number of realistic alternatives, they can focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each and make their decision more quickly.
Zaslove also reminds negotiators against falling for a bluff. When the other side protests one of your moves and says they’re going to walk, it’s easy to backtrack and cave in. But, she says, “The more someone protests that the price is too high, and makes a fuss, generally the more wiggle room you have. Fear the quiet negotiator who isn’t concerned with how he appears.” When the other side is truly ready to walk, they’ve reached closure and express regrets; simply threatening to walk is a sign of anxiety.
By the same token, Zaslove says, your own bluffing can work against you. “If you are not clear about what you want, you are unlikely to get it. I’ve found that focusing on the outcome, and not on how you appear leads to successful outcomes. State what you want and focus only on your intended goal and not on your ego. Relay your position in a simple, straightforward, and confident way.”
Finally, don’t dwell on the time and money required to close the transaction. “Focus on deals that make sense, because time is your most valuable asset,” Zaslove says. “Do not spend time dwelling on the time and money you have already spent.” The more complicated a transaction becomes, the less likely you can close it quickly. Keep it simple.
Read the full article on Lifehacker, adapted from an earlier version on Quora.com.
By: Daily Real Estate News (REALTORMag)
Click here to view source article.

Filed Under: All News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 59
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Search Property
  • Join CARNM
  • CARNM Login
  • NMAR Forms
  • All News
  • All Events
  • Education
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Issues/Concerns
6739 Academy Road NE, Ste 310
Albuquerque, NM 87109
admin@carnm.realtor(505) 503-7807

© 2026, Content: © 2021 Commercial Association of REALTORS® New Mexico. All rights reserved. Website by CARRISTO