• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

CARNM

Commercial Association of REALTORS® - CARNM New Mexico

  • Property Search
    • Search Properties
      • For Sale
      • For Lease
      • For Sale or Lease
      • Start Your Search
    • Location & Type
      • Albuquerque
      • Rio Rancho
      • Las Cruces
      • Santa Fe
      • Industry Types
  • Members
    • New Member
      • About Us
      • Getting Started in Commercial
      • Join CARNM
      • Orientation
    • Resources
      • Find A Broker
      • Code of Ethics
      • Governing Documents
      • NMAR Forms
      • CARNM Forms
      • RPAC
      • Needs & Wants
      • CARNM Directory
      • REALTOR® Benefits
      • Foreign Broker Violation
    • Designations
      • CCIM
      • IREM
      • SIOR
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • About
    • About
      • About Us
      • Join CARNM
      • Sponsors
      • Contact Us
    • People
      • 2026 Board Members
      • Past Presidents
      • REALTORS® of the Year
      • President’s Award Recipients
      • Founder’s Award Recipients
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • Education
    • Courses
      • Register
      • All Education
    • Resources
      • NMREC Licensing
      • Code of Ethics
      • NAR Educational Opportunities
      • CCIM Education
      • IREM Education
      • SIOR Educuation
  • News & Events
    • News
      • All News
      • Market Trends
    • Events
      • All Events Calendar
      • Education
      • CCIM Events
      • LIN Marketing Meeting
      • Thank Yous
  • CARNM Login
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Archives for March 2019

Current Bills of Interest to Commercial Realtors

March 7, 2019 by CARNM

HB206 – THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ACT – OPPOSED BY NMAR (sponsored by Rep. Gail Chasey and Sen. Mimi Stewart)
This controversial bill has major opposition from numerous business groups, including oil and gas and local governments. The bill included a $1.5 million appropriation and wo9uld have required the state to perform an environmental analysis for projects seeking state funding. The bill was considered burdensome, overreaching, and a duplication of efforts. The bill appears to be stalled as it has passed in only one of three committees. The House Energy, Environment & Natural Resources Committee passed it over a month ago, but in a rare move, added, “without recommendation”. The bill is pending in the House State Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee, but has not been scheduled.
HB286 – PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ACT – SUPPORTED BY NMAR (Sponsored by Rep. Patricia Lundstrom)
This bill also seems to be going nowhere. It was introduced on January 21 and has not been heard in committee. The bill would have allowed state and local governments to enter into partnerships with private sector entities to facilitate capital projects like road construction.
HB 597 – CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY BY STEALING REGULATION PROPERTY – (DETERRANT TO COPPER THEFT – Sponsored by Rep. Bash) SUPPORED BY NMAR
This bill would create a third-degree felony for damaging the real or personal property of another in the commission of stealing regulated property (copper wire) when the cost of repair is more than $3,000.
This bill passed 3-2 in the House Consumer & Public Affairs Committee but has not been heard in House Judiciary or House Appropriations. This is one of those bills that will likely take more
than one session to move forward.
SB563 – UNIFORM OWNER-RESIDENT RELATIONS ACT CHANGES – SUPPORTED BY NMAR (sponsored by Senator Ivey-Soto)
This bill was heard last year but failed to advance. Bill was initiated by the New Mexico Apartment Association who had issues with evicted tenants who were able to return to their apartments.
It enjoins a defendant and other occupants from entering premises without the onwer’s permission for 180 days following the execution of a writ of restitution. The owner must make personal property of the defendant left in the dwelling unit available for three days following the execution of the writ.
PAST NMAR SUCCESSES
THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BROKER LIEN ACT
Passed in 2014, the bill permits a broker to place a lien upon commercial real estate in the amount the broker is due for licensed services connected with the leasing of the commercial real estate, including brokerage fees and consulting fees if the broker is entitled to a stated fee or commission.
REAL ESTATE FOREIGN BROKER LICENSURE
Also passed in 2014, this bill created definitions for commercial real estate, foreign broker and non-resident licensee in an effort to allow a broker holding a valid real estate license in another state to practice as an association broker of QB in a commercial estate transaction, provided that the foreign broker enters into a written agreement with a New Mexico licensed QB.

Filed Under: All News

Antitrust Class Action Filed Against Realtors Over Commissions

March 6, 2019 by CARNM

A group of recent home sellers filed a class action antitrust lawsuit against multiple realty agencies in federal court in Chicago Wednesday, alleging the agencies conspired to develop a commission scheme that significantly inflated the cost of selling their homes.
The 30-page complaint claims the defendants, including The National Association of Realtors, Realogy Holdings and RE/MAX Holdings, conspired “to require home sellers to pay the broker representing the buyer of their homes, and to pay at an inflated amount, in violation of federal antitrust law.”
The plaintiffs allege that the conspiracy has centered around The National Association of Realtors’ “adoption and implementation of a rule that requires all brokers to make a blanket, non-negotiable offer of buyer broker compensation…when listing a property on a Multiple Listing Service,” or MLS.
This makes the market noncompetitive, according to the complaint, since the cost of paying a commission to the buyer broker is a cost that would normally fall on the home buyer in an ordinary, competitive market. And since the defendants have control of the local MLS, which is the key database of region-specific property listings on which most homes in the United States are sold, this gives them unfair leverage and market power.
The lawsuit also notes that “in furtherance of the conspiracy” The National Association of Realtors “advises MLS’s to enter into non-compete agreements with third-party websites, such as Zillow, so that those websites do not become competitive rivals to MLS’s.”
This means that in order for another listing service to compete under these rules, they need to have listings as comprehensive as the popular MLS’s. The inability to list properties for sale in a centralized MLS database excludes a broker or agent from the vast resources an MLS makes available.
The complaint makes the point that The National Association of Realtors requires its members to comply with the buyer broker commission rule as part of its handbook and code of ethics.
For context, the complaint states that “Brokers and their agents who currently profit from inflated buyer broker commissions and total commissions have minimal incentive to participate on an alternative listing service that would general lower buyer broker commissions and lower total commissions.”
“In a typical transaction,” the complaint states, “separate brokers will represent the seller and the buyer of a home. Both the buyer broker and seller broker…are paid a percentage of the property’s sales price.” Usually, the total broker compensation in the U.S. is around five to six percent of the home’s sale price, with half that amount going to the buyer broker.
However, the complaint charges that the “Defendant’s conspiracy has kept buyer broker commissions in the 2.5 to 3 percent range for many years despite the diminishing role of buyer brokers.”
An example in the complaint states that a class member who sold their house for $500,000 paid the buyer broker somewhere in the range of $12,000 to $15,000 in additional commissions due to the conspiracy. In a competitive market, the seller would pay nothing to the buyer broker.
Plaintiffs’ attorney Benjamin Brown, with the Washington, D.C. branch of the Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll firm, said in a statement that “For years, economists have been sounding the alarm that American home sellers are paying inflated broker commissions.”
“This stems from that fact that to list a home for sale on an MLS, sellers need to agree to play by a set of rules that distort and destroy competition, including requiring home sellers to pay the buyer’s broker,” Brown said.
Christopher Moehrl, a listed plaintiff in the lawsuit, sold a home in the Minneapolis area in November 2017. According to complaint, he listed his home on the local Northstar MLS and, at the end of the transaction, Moehrl had paid 2.7 percentage points to the buyer broker.
The suit claims that the alleged conspiracy violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and requests that the court award the class a permanent injunction under Section 16 of the Clayton Act “enjoining defendants from continuing to require sellers to pay the buyer broker and from continuing to restrict competition among broker buyers” among other measures.
Representatives with The National Association of Realtors could not be reached after business hours Wednesday for comment.
By: Joe Kelly (Courthouse News Service)
Click here to view source article.

Filed Under: All News

February 2019 Commercial Market Trends

March 3, 2019 by mcarristo

View a New Mexico Market Trends Summary Report, which includes February 2019 Commercial Market Trends. This report includes the total number of listings, asking lease rates, asking sales prices, days on the market and total square feet available.

Disclaimer: All statistics have been gathered from user-loaded listings and user-reported transactions. We have not verified accuracy and make no guarantees. By using the information, the user acknowledges that the data may contain errors or other nonconformities. Brokers should diligently and independently verify the specifics of the information you are using.

Filed Under: Market Trends

Support the Arena Development

March 3, 2019 by jakobsmith

An Arena Deal is Close:

The new Downtown Milwaukee Arena is close to becoming a reality – but not a done deal.  Owners along with Local and State officials have been diligently meeting to finalize the plan.  While the benefits are unquestionable for the City, County and State, a complete funding model is the last piece of the puzzle and requires certainty around the local contribution.  Many ideas have been considered and have amounted to a majority of the arena’s $500 million price tag to be funded.  We are considering an approximate $50 to $100 million gap that will ultimately determine if we build the arena or not.  You have a role in helping make this happen.  The State Legislature and the Governor have committed $150 million to the project.  By contacting your city and county officials, you can show them that YOU support this project and their continued efforts.

Consider the following:

  • With the arena, we expect to see more than 10,000 jobs.  Many of those jobs will employ City of Milwaukee residents and include both construction and permanent positions that are propped up by the influx in activity around the construction of the project.
  • The arena development will lead to an anticipated $500 million in surrounding development.  Owners chose the adjacent Park East location in order to allow for additional development of much needed office, multi-family and other mixed-use development.
  • The arena will bring $730 million in new revenue for the State of Wisconsin in the form of income taxes over 30 years.  If the team leaves, the money will follow.
  • The impacts of development will be felt immediately with economic benefits for years to come.
  • The development will bring density and connectivity to Downtown Milwaukee through a year-round retail and entertainment design and infrastructure changes that encourage traffic flow.
  • Other cities making investments in similar projects have seen increases in permits pulled, traffic to the area and jobs created.

This catalytic project will benefit us all.  Take action NOW to ensure the project is completed.

What can you do?  Contact your local officials to tell them you support the new arena.  Urge them to continue their work to find agreement on the funding.  Officials have been committed to creative solutions and must be encouraged to continue.

  • Mayor Tom Barrett’s Office: 414-286-2200 | mayor@milwaukee.gov (sample letter here) | Click Here to E-Mail Mayor Barrett NOW!
  • County Executive Chris Abele’s Office: 414-278-4211 | CountyExec@milwaukeecountywi.gov (sample letter here) | Click Here to E-Mail County Executive Abele NOW!


CARW’s Interest in this project:

The Commercial Association of REALTORS is the Voice for commercial real estate in Wisconsin and has vowed to support the Milwaukee Downtown sports and entertainment arena.  The 600 member organization representing many facets of the commercial real estate industry has been a vocal supporter of the project from day one.  Our interest lies in growing the region – making our City and our State an even more desirable and profitable destination for tourists, residents and businesses.   We care about economic development, prosperity and jobs.  Our members work each and every day with business owners and communities making decisions on where to locate – and so often, these entities look to the vitality of an area to make that decision.  They consider entertainment options, housing options, job options, and look closely to the connectivity to other economic drivers like retail and education.

The industry understands that large projects such as the arena, fuel economic development and connectivity, two vital and much-needed aspects for Milwaukee.  While geographically centered in Downtown Milwaukee, the impacts are regional and Statewide.  The construction of the downtown Milwaukee arena is a once in a lifetime opportunity to capitalize on a number of assets including the Milwaukee Bucks and the new ownership.

CARW has been one of a multi-faceted coalition, Play It Forward Wisconsin which includes individuals and organizations supporting this generational project and is committed to ensuring the discussions related to the final funding pieces continue as positively as they have to this point.  Timing is critical as if plans are not firm very soon, Milwaukee is in jeopardy of losing the team and losing out on what is anticipated to be a $1 billion development.  These opportunities, once gone, rarely return.  We are committed to doing everything possible to bring this project to light.

[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Filed Under: All News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Search Property
  • Join CARNM
  • CARNM Login
  • NMAR Forms
  • All News
  • All Events
  • Education
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Issues/Concerns
6739 Academy Road NE, Ste 310
Albuquerque, NM 87109
admin@carnm.realtor(505) 503-7807

© 2026, Content: © 2021 Commercial Association of REALTORS® New Mexico. All rights reserved. Website by CARRISTO