• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

CARNM

Commercial Association of REALTORS® - CARNM New Mexico

  • Property Search
    • Search Properties
      • For Sale
      • For Lease
      • For Sale or Lease
      • Start Your Search
    • Location & Type
      • Albuquerque
      • Rio Rancho
      • Las Cruces
      • Santa Fe
      • Industry Types
  • Members
    • New Member
      • About Us
      • Getting Started in Commercial
      • Join CARNM
      • Orientation
    • Resources
      • Find A Broker
      • Code of Ethics
      • Governing Documents
      • NMAR Forms
      • CARNM Forms
      • RPAC
      • Needs & Wants
      • CARNM Directory
      • REALTOR® Benefits
      • Foreign Broker Violation
    • Designations
      • CCIM
      • IREM
      • SIOR
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • About
    • About
      • About Us
      • Join CARNM
      • Sponsors
      • Contact Us
    • People
      • 2026 Board Members
      • Past Presidents
      • REALTORS® of the Year
      • President’s Award Recipients
      • Founder’s Award Recipients
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • Education
    • Courses
      • Register
      • All Education
    • Resources
      • NMREC Licensing
      • Code of Ethics
      • NAR Educational Opportunities
      • CCIM Education
      • IREM Education
      • SIOR Educuation
  • News & Events
    • News
      • All News
      • Market Trends
    • Events
      • All Events Calendar
      • Education
      • CCIM Events
      • LIN Marketing Meeting
      • Thank Yous
  • CARNM Login
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Archives for February 2020

Exclusive Research: Keep on Trucking

February 24, 2020 by CARNM

There’s little dimming the outlook for the industrial sector, according to our latest study on the sector.
Neither ongoing international trade disputes, nor the warning signs of a potential recession, nor the uncertainty that’s emanating from a particularly fraught U.S. presidential election year are enough to dim the enthusiasm for the industrial real estate sector, according to the findings in NREI’s sixth annual study.
In our 2019 survey, sentiment was also strong for industrial fundamentals across the board, but there were some signs of trepidation, with bullishness on many metrics a tick below where it had been in previous years. This year that sense of caution has evaporated. The unexpected shift to an economic climate with falling interest rates has served as a boost to all commercial real estate sectors and industrial is no exception to that trend.

One respondent wrote, “The momentum that has happened fuels even further expansion. The sight of a completed project stimulates the vision of more.” Another described the industrial sector’s conditions as “markets are not overbuilt, capital is available, the fundamentals of the overall economy are still strong and the retail shift to efficient delivery model is still in early stages.”
One relative gauge of readers’ comfort with the sector is that a majority of respondents said they think the current expansion cycle will last another 13 to 24 months or longer. In all, 57.8 percent of respondents answered “13 to 24 months” (40.0 percent) or “longer than two years” (17.8 percent). Last year, the combined figure for those responses was 44 percent. To put that another way, despite 12 months having passed, industry participants see a longer runway ahead for the industrial sector today than they did a year ago.
At the other end, a small minority (7.0 percent) said the “expansion phase has already ended.” In our 2019 survey that number was 12.0 percent.
According to respondents, cap rates in the sector tightened. Most estimate industrial caps at sub-6.0 percent in their regions (5.8 percent) and nationally (5.9 percent). The regional figure had held steady at 6.1 percent for the previous three years. That dovetails with industry data. According to CBRE’s most recent U.S. cap rate survey, industrial cap rates nationally stood at 6.13 percent as of the second half of 2019. That included cap rates of 4.89 percent on class-A assets, 5.80 percent on class-B assets and 7.87 percent on class-C assets.
One major change from last year’s survey is that we’ve gone from a rising interest rate environment to one where the Fed has now been steadily reducing rates. As a result, expectations on cap rates have shifted considerably from past surveys. In most previous years, a majority or plurality of respondents expected cap rates in the sector to rise and another chunk of respondents expected cap rates to remain flat. Generally, fewer than 20 percent of respondents have predicted lower cap rates. This year, however, the numbers have shifted. Only 26 percent of respondents this year expect cap rates to rise in the next 12 months—the lowest figure we’ve recorded in the six years of the survey. A plurality (47 percent) expect stability. Meanwhile, 28 percent expect cap rates to decrease—the largest figure we’ve seen since the 2015 survey.

The finance and investment picture

Survey respondents see a stable picture on the capital markets front.
For equity, 44.4 percent of respondents said the availability of capital was unchanged from a year ago (the figure has been consistent now for the last three years). An additional 36.5 percent said capital was more widely available (up marginally from last year’s 33.0 percent). Meanwhile, only 9.5 percent said less equity capital was available (down from 15.0 percent a year ago).
The picture is nearly the same on the debt side, where 51.8 percent said it was unchanged (up a hair from the 47.0 percent in 2019), 31.2 percent said it was more widely available (up from 27.0 percent), and only 8.5 percent said it was less available (down from 15 percent).
A respondent added, “There are still several years to go in the double-digit growth rate of e-commerce, there has not been overdevelopment in most markets, and there is an overabundance of debt and equity capital interested in this sector.”
As for the macro factors that impact capital markets, the only significant change, unsurprisingly, pertains to interest rate expectations. A year ago, nearly four-fifths (79 percent) expected further interest rate increases, while only 1 percent said they expected rates to decrease. It turns out the 1 percenters were correct. This year, 62 percent see interest rates staying flat. About one-quarter (23 percent) see further decreases ahead and now just 15 percent expect interest rates to tick back up in the next 12 months.
For the other factors, the numbers were fairly consistent, with between three-fifths and two-thirds of respondents seeing loan-to-value ratios (68 percent), debt service coverage ratios (67 percent) and the risk premium (62 percent) all remaining stable in the year ahead.
When it comes  to investment activity, respondents have shifted to more of a “hold” mentality (58.3 percent this year, up from 46.8 percent in 2019). About one-third (32.2 percent) said they plan to buy—which is down just slightly from a year ago (35.4 percent). The real movement came on the sell side, where just 9.4 percent said they plan to sell industrial properties in the next year—a level nearly half of what it was a year ago (17.7 percent) and the lowest in the four years we’ve asked this question.
Respondents had some thoughts as to where that activity will occur. There’s been a growing preference for “last-mile” warehouse and distribution facilities. This year, 53.4 percent said they think that sub-sector will be in most demand, representing 17.4 percentage points of growth in the past two years.
As one respondent described it, “There is still such a strong demand for industrial and distribution, in particular for last-mile space, given how much consumers are spending on e-commerce. Retailers need to get their products out quickly.”
Meanwhile, traditional warehouse/distribution facilities still top the list at 59.3 percent. But the gap between those two types has shrunk from 28 percentage points in 2018 down to less than six percentage points in this year’s survey.

Healthy demand endures

Despite industrial real estate’s long bull run and a robust pipeline that delivered more than 330 million sq. ft. of new space in 2019 in North America and is projected to deliver more than 300 million sq. ft. of space this year, according to figures from Cushman & Wakefield, respondents largely remain unconcerned about the potential for overdevelopment.
In all, 58.3 percent of respondents said the level of development is about right for the sector, up from 50.0 percent last year. And just less than one-quarter of respondents (21.9 percent) indicated there is too little development occurring (down slightly from 27.0 percent last year). Meanwhile, only 7.8 percent said too much development is taking place.
However, respondents’ estimates about how much additional supply their markets could absorb shifted some from previous years. Last year marked a high with 24 percent of respondents saying that their markets could take on new supply equal to 25 percent or more of current inventory levels. That number dropped to just 14 percent this year. Instead, roughly half of respondents pegged the level at 10 percent to 14 percent of current inventory (28.6 percent) or five percent to nine percent of current inventory (21.4 percent).
For its part, Cushman & Wakefield said that deliveries did outpace net absorption in 2019 and that is likely to occur again in 2020 and 2021. The net result is the vacancy rate for industrial properties in North America will likely tick up from current levels of 4.6 percent to about 5.2 percent in the next two years.
“This sector does not have approved projects that match the demand being created by growth in several important sectors: biotech; technology; warehousing,” one respondent wrote in. “The absorption rates will continue to be strong and expansion will continue in the sector.”
As in past years, we continued to gauge how the conversion of old industrial boxes into other uses is affecting industrial real estate fundamentals.
Overall, 57.6 percent of respondents said that this activity is taking place in their markets—the lowest level in the six years we’ve been asking the question. (The figure previously had hovered between 64 percent and 70 percent in all the years we’ve conducted the survey.)
Respondents are also seeing these conversions having less effect on the market. In the past, surveys indicated that this activity was leading to lower total inventory in the industrial space. The number peaked at 53 percent in 2015, but has fallen to a new low of 23.9 percent in this year’s survey. Now, a clear majority says these conversions are either being balanced by new construction (46.8 percent) or that new construction is outpacing the loss of space to conversions (29.4 percent). Both those figures represent new highs.
Meanwhile, in terms of overall occupancy rates, numbers were consistent with last year’s levels. In all, 49 percent said they expect occupancy rates to rise in their region this year (up slightly from 45 percent in 2019). An additional 35 percent expect no change (virtually unchanged from 33 percent last year). And, 16 percent said occupancy rates will decrease—down four percentage points from last year’s figure.
On one other fundamental—rents—respondents’ expectations remained virtually identical with levels from past years.
The majority of respondents (approximately 78 percent) said they expect rents to rise in their region in the next 12 months. (The figure has been around 80 percent in all six surveys.) A mere 3 percent said they think rents will decline. That level has never topped 4 percent in any of our studies. Meanwhile, 18 percent said rents will be flat—down some from the 22 percent who answered that way in 2019.
Lastly, respondents were asked to rank the relative strength of their regions. The results were similar to past years (on a scale of 1 to 10)—with the West (8.2) and the South (8.2) continuing to top the East (7.8) and Midwest (7.2). The numbers for all four regions were within 20 basis points of the figures from last year’s survey.
Survey methodology: The NREI research report on the industrial real estate sector was completed via online surveys distributed to readers of National Real Estate Investor in January 2020. The survey yielded 207 responses. Recipients were asked what regions they operated in (and were allowed to select multiple regions). Overall, 46.9 percent said they operated in the South, followed by the West (45.3 percent), East (44.8 percent) and Midwest (32.8 percent). Approximately half of respondents are investors and developers. About half of respondents (41.7 percent) hold the titles of owner, partner, president, chairman, CEO or CFO.
By: David Bodamer (NREI)
Click here to view source article

Filed Under: All News

CRE-CLOs Continue to Mount a Comeback

February 24, 2020 by CARNM

Part of what is driving volume are high levels of liquidity propelled by demand from investors who are interested in acquired short term paper.
They’re back! The market for commercial real estate collateralized loan obligations (CRE-CLOs) evaporated in the wake of the financial crisis. For years volumes in this part of the market chugged along with low levels of activity. But that all changed in 2018 with volume reaching nearly $14 billion, according to Commercial Mortgage Alert. And then 2020 topped that figure with more than $19 billion.
But that doesn’t mean originators are over their skis, as they were in the last cycle. Pros say today’s offerings are not the risky collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) of old that were around pre-recession. “The product class is more conservative across the board,” says Brent Wagner, managing director, Capital Markets at ACORE Capital. “Advance rates are lower, and the collateral is relatively ‘light’ value-add versus more complex collateral from more than a decade ago where it was harder to figure out what was going into those issuances,” he adds.

ACORE Capital has not gone down the path of CRE-CLO issuance. “So far, we have found pretty attractive alternatives with our A-note or first mortgage sales or repo loans away from the CRE-CLO space, but we are keeping our ear to the ground and watching the market and its growth,” says Wagner.

There are some key differences to the newer CRE-CLO structure and the pre-recession CDOs. The CRE-CLO securitizations that have been issued since 2012 have been solely backed by first lien, whole loans and A-notes on direct commercial real estate interests. In addition, issuers are required to keep some skin in the game by retaining some of the bonds. CDOs that were issued from 2004 to 2008 were typically backed by different asset types that included securities. Some pools also included subordinate debt, such as mezzanine and B-notes. According to Commercial Mortgage Alert, CRE-CDOs issuance dropped to $283 million last year, which is a fraction of its pre-recession peak of $39 billion in 2017.

Growing pool of issuers

Part of what is driving volume are high levels of liquidity propelled by demand from investors who are interested in acquired short term paper. That certainly fits the niche for CRE-CLOs, which are typically backed by assets with short-term loans. In addition, pricing has become more competitive, which is driving more activity on behalf of issuers. In particular, CLOs can represent a lower cost capital source for debt funds and other alternative lenders looking to fund bridge loans compared to a bank warehouse loan or line of credit.
The pool of issuers also has been expanding along with growing issuance volume, and many expect it to widen further in 2020. According to Commercial Mortgage Alert, there were  seven CLO issuers in 2016, 13 in 2017, 19 in 2018 and 24 in 2019.
For debt funds that are doing bridge loans, CRE-CLOs represent another financing lever to pull along with other options such as A-note sales, first mortgage sales, repo lines, note-on-note financing and other ways to structure cross pools of senior debt to drive down cost of capital. For some, it is a little easier to take $500 million or $1 billion in collateral to the CRE-CLO and get it financed in one large transaction.

Lenders weigh pros and cons

Toorak Capital Partners is an active securitization participant with one issuance in 2018 and two in 2019 for a combined issued notes volume just under $800 million. “We expect to be a regular issuer going forward,” says John Beacham, CEO of Toorak Capital Partners. Those past issuances were a combination of residential and multifamily bridge loans. Toorak is in the process of evaluating whether to separate out its multifamily bridge loans versus combining them with residential as it has done in the past. If that is the case, that multifamily issuance would be done in the CRE-CLO market.
One of the downsides to the CLO market is lack of flexibility. Eligibility rules govern what types of loans can go into a pool once it is set up. Another negative to CLOs is that there are a lot of issuance costs. That being said, as loans pay off, they can be replaced with new loans to keep the CLO going for a longer period of time. “If we did that on a static pool, that would be pretty expensive,” says Beacham. “Replacing those initial loans with new loans means that we can basically amortize that upfront cost over a longer period of time.”
It also is notable that there are more CLO issuance transactions that are revolving and have a bigger reinvestment component. In fact, more than half of transactions issued last year were reinvestment transactions, notes Deryk Meherik, senior vice president, Structured Finance at Moody’s Investors Service. Essentially, loans in the pool are revolving out either because they are maturing or being pre-paid. “What that brings is a challenge of finding new loans to replace loans that have paid off and be put into the pool within that reinvestment period,” he says. There doesn’t seem to be any shortage of replacement loans to keep pools fully invested, but that could be something to watch in the future, he adds.
By: Beth Mattson-Teig (NREI)
Click here to view source article

Filed Under: All News

A Guide to Repurposing Retail Centers

February 20, 2020 by CARNM

Every underperforming or shuttered mall has its own set of opportunities and obstacles.

We hear a lot about the demise of shopping malls – once the staple of the American suburban psyche – but by thinking creatively and applying the fundamentals of commercial real estate development, malls can be redeveloped to serve, once again, as community hubs.
In Austin, Texas, the former Highland Mall, which once boasted 1.2 million square feet, is now home to the largest campus of the Austin Community College.
In Vancouver, British Columbia, the 540,000-square-foot former Brentwood Town Centre is now The Amazing Brentwood, a master-planned redevelopment with the potential for 4.5 million square feet of residential properties, 1.1 million square feet of retail and 1 million square feet of office.
And in Nashville, Tennessee, the 100 Oaks Mall – once Tennessee’s largest mall – is now home to the Vanderbilt Medical Center, which combined 20 outlying clinics into one location that more efficiently serves its patients.
Malls may seem like dinosaurs in today’s world of online shopping and open-air retail environments, but a retail property’s proximity to highways and residential areas can make it a good candidate for redevelopment or adaptive reuse. Working closely with local officials and members of the community is critical to a project’s success.
Every underperforming or shuttered mall has its own set of opportunities and obstacles. However, there are common strategies that developers and lenders can follow when evaluating the sites’ potential. These are articulated in NAIOP Research Foundation’s new report: Repurposing Retail Centers: Profiles in Adaptation, Repositioning and Redevelopment.
And the results are tangible. A successful mall redevelopment project often provides a community with significant economic and social benefits.
The NAIOP Research Foundation report details five unique case studies from across North America, sharing vital takeaways that are specific to each case study and yet can be almost universally applied:
Redevelopment can be a cause of concern within a neighborhood; however, by communicating and working with community leaders and activists, it usually will be outweighed by the dissatisfaction with a decaying mall.
The size and scope of certain types of developments will require significant and complicated financing, possibly including working with multiple lenders for different portions of the project.
Integrating new uses and managing construction while retail tenants remain open is challenging. Effective construction management is critical. With significant overlap in a project’s timing, financing and delivery dates, construction and operations may have to occur simultaneously across the property. But retailers can continue to operate successfully in the middle of a large active construction zone when managed correctly.
Retailers can be hesitant about sharing parking spaces with other types of tenants such as medical offices. Yet research demonstrates that medical office peak hours tend to be at times when retail foot traffic was lowest, and that peak retail foot traffic occurs when medical offices were closed.
Overall, of course, those considering a mall redevelopment will have to think beyond traditional retail uses.
In the cases presented in the NAIOP report, the respective regions experienced improvements in land use that impacted the quality of life for their residents through job creation, expanded educational opportunities, additional open space and access to health care.
The end result may be vastly different from the malls we once knew, but developers and lenders should have confidence that completely or even partially redeveloped malls can yet be a symbol of vitality for the communities they serve.
By: Thomas J. Bisacquino (GlobeSt)
Click here to view source article

Filed Under: All News

What Investors Need to Know About Distressed Funds

February 20, 2020 by CARNM

When buying distressed debt, a buyer needs to have full knowledge of the loan and the asset.

There’s nothing that excites right estate investors quite like distressed assets or debt. Many businesses were built on buying a troubled asset cheaply and eventually selling at a higher price.
But distressed debts are assets that can also get investors into a lot of trouble. “You can’t just run in, buy distressed and make a billion dollars,” says Carol Faber, co-chair of Akerman’s distressed property practice. “You can’t just say, I can get it for X percent of what its value is, and I’m going to come in and I’m going to make a killing.”
Before someone buys distressed debt, they need to know the entire picture—about the loan, the asset and the ground under it. “You really need to understand the business side, the economics, the asset type, where it is located, and what you can do with the property,’ Faber says.
Faber says it is also essential to understand the legal side of distressed deals. “If the loan is going to fail, you need somebody that knows how to look at those loan documents and knows what to look for,” she says.
And another important question is who controls the money. You need to know, “is there cash management in place? Is it provided for in the loan documents? If it’s provided for, is it being followed? Is it already set up? And is it in place?” she says.
If the cash management isn’t in place, Faber says it’s challenging to get a borrower about to default to cooperate. “The the key in a lot of these distressed deals is controlling the cash and controlling the property,” Faber says. “That’s important.”
An investor in distressed debt also needs to know who is in the capital stack. “It’s not just the mortgage lender,” she says. “You could have a senior mortgage loan, junior loan, mortgage or mezz debt. You’ve got to see which way you’ve got people involved, and you’ve got to be really careful and figure out where you are.”
Faber says borrowers have gotten a lot smarter since the last downturn and have negotiated strong positions in private loans that can’t be freely assigned.
There are also brick-and-mortar real estate issues to consider, such as the condition of the property. If it’s a development deal, distressed buyers need to know if there is an environmental issue and the status of entitlements, approvals and land use. Buyers should also find out if the entitlements are transferable.
“I’ve been involved in several deals recently where the entitlements are not transferable,” Faber says. “So, what does that mean if a lender forecloses? Can they take that over?”
Then there are fractured condos, which were prevalent in Florida during the Great Recession. They can bring a host of new issues. “You’ve got to be very careful how you handle those when you’re the buyer,” she says.
By: Les Shaver (GlobeSt)
Click here to view source article

Filed Under: All News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Search Property
  • Join CARNM
  • CARNM Login
  • NMAR Forms
  • All News
  • All Events
  • Education
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Issues/Concerns
6739 Academy Road NE, Ste 310
Albuquerque, NM 87109
admin@carnm.realtor(505) 503-7807

© 2026, Content: © 2021 Commercial Association of REALTORS® New Mexico. All rights reserved. Website by CARRISTO