• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

CARNM

Commercial Association of REALTORS® - CARNM New Mexico

  • Property Search
    • Search Properties
      • For Sale
      • For Lease
      • For Sale or Lease
      • Start Your Search
    • Location & Type
      • Albuquerque
      • Rio Rancho
      • Las Cruces
      • Santa Fe
      • Industry Types
  • Members
    • New Member
      • About Us
      • Getting Started in Commercial
      • Join CARNM
      • Orientation
    • Resources
      • Find A Broker
      • Code of Ethics
      • Governing Documents
      • NMAR Forms
      • CARNM Forms
      • RPAC
      • Needs & Wants
      • CARNM Directory
      • REALTOR® Benefits
      • Foreign Broker Violation
    • Designations
      • CCIM
      • IREM
      • SIOR
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • About
    • About
      • About Us
      • Join CARNM
      • Sponsors
      • Contact Us
    • People
      • 2026 Board Members
      • Past Presidents
      • REALTORS® of the Year
      • President’s Award Recipients
      • Founder’s Award Recipients
    • Issues/Concerns
      • FAQ
      • Ombuds Process
      • Professional Standards
      • Issues/Concerns
      • Foreign Broker Violation
  • Education
    • Courses
      • Register
      • All Education
    • Resources
      • NMREC Licensing
      • Code of Ethics
      • NAR Educational Opportunities
      • CCIM Education
      • IREM Education
      • SIOR Educuation
  • News & Events
    • News
      • All News
      • Market Trends
    • Events
      • All Events Calendar
      • Education
      • CCIM Events
      • LIN Marketing Meeting
      • Thank Yous
  • CARNM Login
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Archives for June 2021

Back to the Office?

June 10, 2021 by CARNM

As offices reopen, the COVID-19 workplace must emphasize flexibility, safety, and collaboration.

As the economic recovery begins and COVID-19 vaccines become readily available, businesses and real estate professionals alike are working to determine their post-pandemic steps in the office market.

The 2020 numbers are bleak. A recent report from Cushman & Wakefield Chief Economist Kevin Thorpe noted that the office sector experienced 104 million sf of negative absorption in 2020 — more severe than the impact of the recession of 2008. In the wake of COVID-19, 1.15 million office-using jobs were eliminated, with office vacancy rising from 12.9 percent to 15.5 percent by the end of 2020.

“Office leases are long term,” says Dan Spiegel, vice president and managing director for Coldwell Banker Commercial. “We’re in the discovery phase of what the future of office will be and what its impact on office property owners will be. In the short term, the pandemic has driven employees home. The question is, how comfortable will firms be keeping some of those people home permanently versus the value of having them back in the office? Some firms are subleasing space because, in the near term, they’re not seeing the need for employees to come back to the office. Other firms are taking space because they’ve come up for renewal, and they have to make a decision. We’re still in the early stages of understanding what the long-term impact will be.”

 

More than anything, the watchword appears to be flexibility. The first key will be how companies decide to bring workforces back to the office. The Cushman & Wakefield report notes several big-picture factors that will affect this return, including the trajectory of the virus, the speed at which vaccines are rolled out, how soon schools reopen, and government policies. But companies and employees will also have to examine the necessity of coming back to the office after a year of figuring out how to work remotely. Working at home, of course, is nothing new, but, Spiegel says, “the pandemic has accelerated many trends in the workplace that were already underway.”

“We’re entering a near-term era of workplace flexibility,” he adds. “Companies are not yet sure of what they’re losing by not having people in the office, so they don’t know if they want to give up the office all together. Some people are comfortable working from home; others are challenged balancing family priorities and other things.”

“There’s still a wide unknown out there,” says Scott Homa, senior vice president and director of U.S. office research for JLL. “Before the pandemic, 10 percent of who you’d typically think of as an office employee worked principally from home. We think that share is certainly going to increase, but it’s likely to increase more within a hybrid format,” where employees may come into the office only a few days a week. The challenge in moving in that direction, though, he says, will be managing the capacity of the space and accommodating work schedules, safety protocols, and other factors.

Another factor, particularly in high-density urban areas, is the commute. Homa notes that it may be a while before people are comfortable getting on crowded trains or buses. Add to that the commuting time itself — a recent PwC/Urban Land Institute study calculated an average of 227 hours a year saved by not commuting. The savings, according to the study titled Emerging Trends in Real Estate, “has been well received by many. That is certainly not surprising, since it is the equivalent of 28 days that could be dedicated to work or leisure.”

A large part of companies’ reluctance to invest too deeply in a remote format is the nature of the office itself. “The purpose of the office in many ways is not just providing an environment for people to do individual tasks, but more so around the collaboration and innovation that the physical space can be used to facilitate,” says Homa. “People want to be together to collaborate, problem-solve, and meet with clients.”

Offices provide other functions as well. “In-person workplaces are critical for company culture, innovation, [and] onboarding for new employees,” according to Emerging Trends in Real Estate. Younger or new employees may prefer the office environment, which could provide more opportunities for learning and making business and social connections. In many cases, in-person workplaces can offer more resources and tools to help them be productive. The report also points out that working remotely could present challenges to some employees because of space or technology issues at home.

Changing Space

However companies choose to bring back workers, offices themselves will face physical changes. “We’re likely to see office layouts change, in which there’s some de-densification, in which there’s a reallocation of space from individual workstations to larger, collaborative meeting spaces,” says Homa.

The question is, how comfortable will firms be keeping some of those people home permanently versus the value of having them back in the office?

The PwC/Urban Land Institute report notes that companies had been reducing office space before COVID-19 by shrinking the space per worker through bench seating and an increased use of common areas. This trend, though, will likely reverse — 63 percent of the respondents said that because of social distancing recommendations, office tenants would now need to increase the square footage per worker.

In the short term, Homa says, offices will also have to offer pandemic-related safety features such as hand-sanitizing stations, social-distancing measures and signage, and touchless technology. Longer term, he says, “the pandemic has provided a renewed focus around health and well-being in general, and specifically indoor air quality. Ventilation, filtration, and air purification are huge issues, whether that means upgrading HVAC equipment, putting higher caliber filters in place, or even changing design specs around projects to provide operable windows or outdoor and terrace space.”

Such improvements will come at a price; although Emerging Trends notes that because the demand for increased health and safety features has been so accelerated, the market is still sorting out the requirements and costs. The report quotes one developer who estimated costs “somewhere around 1 to 2 percent of our total development budget.” At the same time, such upgrades could end up being a competitive feature in the marketplace. The report quotes one executive who said, “Smart building owners are going to want to say our building has the cleanest air quality.”

Coworking spaces help companies that might be reluctant to lease space because they’re not sure of their workers’ needs.

Another competitive feature that went dormant in the pandemic but will likely return? The trend toward high-end amenities, such as in-house gyms, coffee bars, and posh cafeterias will pick up where it left off before the pandemic. “Just as restaurants are opening up, these help create a desirable environment for workers,” says Spiegel. “Presuming they can accommodate public health measures, I think those places will stay. We just want them to be safe.”

The post-pandemic work environment may give a boost to coworking spaces. “I think what was originally perceived to be a high-risk moment to coworking may be the salvation once the pandemic is addressed,” Spiegel says. “They present a workplace solution that’s flexible, because it’s not long-term, and ubiquitous, because there are so many locations.” Coworking spaces, he says, help companies that might be reluctant to lease space because they’re not sure of their workers’ needs. The flexible model lets them wait and see how the marketplace will shake out.

In fact, a recent report from Colliers International predicts “significant growth” of flexible workspace outside of CBDs. It also says the “flexible workspace supply outside of downtown locations is already causing a supply pinch in some markets.” The report, Flex Forward: What’s Next for Flex in 2021, adds that non-CBD flexible space will increase dramatically this year, with supply coming from existing operators and new entrants as well as “repositioned retail and hotel assets.”

City vs. Suburbs

As the pandemic progressed through 2020, many city-dwellers looked to relocate to suburban and even exurban areas, both to escape densely packed urban areas and have more space as they started working from home. Will offices follow?

“There’s a tremendous amount of talk about the urban-to-suburban migration, but the larger issue is region to region,” says Homa, “and all of that isn’t completely new and driven by the pandemic.” Companies relocate for such factors as climate, the tax environment, and the availability and cost of labor. He points to states like Texas, Florida, and other lower-cost markets that started to experience growth even before 2020. “But in terms of tenants making a 10- or 15-year commitment to the suburbs rather than the city, that’s not something we’re seeing.”

Spiegel, too, says he’s seen “a handful of stories about companies consolidating operations in the suburbs, but I don’t think it’s yet to be declared a trend.” Still, he says, “now that people have worked at home for close to a year, are they going to prefer to be closer to their home if they’re suburban residents? Or will we go back to what’s been the trend of the last five years [with] similar workers congregating in the CBD?” In the short term, he speculates that companies could offer a hub-and-spoke model or alternative work locations for suburbanites who have fled the city or who aren’t yet comfortable returning to mass transit.

As they navigate the post-pandemic office landscape, real estate professionals will likely encounter a host of unfamiliar challenges.

Cushman & Wakefield data show that cities are still making a strong showing in the office market. While the firm’s sample size was smaller for 2020, it reports that CBDs account for 30 to 40 percent of leases in a typical year — a figure that didn’t change in 2020. In addition, Cushman & Wakefield says it found no evidence that many businesses were leaving big cities for smaller ones. About a third of all U.S. office leasing occurs in gateway cities in a typical year, and that figure was similar in 2020 at 32 percent.

Exploring Subleasing

As companies reassessed their space strategy in 2020, the subleasing market surged. JLL research shows that the sublease market expanded by nearly 47.6 million sf since the pandemic began, bringing the total to 141.5 million sf. The largest industry sectors giving back space were tech companies, who subleased 5.8 million sf, and finance with 2.9 million sf. By February 2021, though, Homa says “one encouraging sign has been an uptick in tour activity among those sublease spaces that have been put on the market, as well as a handful of executed deals and a deceleration of blocks put on the market.”

It could take time for rents to show a decline. A February report from Cushman & Wakefield noted that historically, national office asking rents don’t decline until four quarters after vacancy begins to increase. In fact, the report points out, during the last two recessions, no U.S. markets hit their overall rent trough within a year. There have been exceptions this time around; Colliers 4Q2020 Office Market Outlook reports that the largest 4Q declines in major CBD markets were San Francisco (-9.8 percent), Austin (-3.7 percent), and Manhattan (-2.8 percent). And a February Moody’s Analytics forecast predicted a 7.5 percent decline in 2021 and added, “We do not expect average effective office rents to reach their pre-pandemic levels until 2026.”

As property is leased, “landlords have been reluctant to move face rates,” says Homa. “But we have seen on a net effective basis, inclusive of concession packages, some shifts that are more tenant favorable — largely through things like free rent and tenant improvement allowances. But landlords have had that bias to keep face rates fairly steady.” Leases did get shorter during 2020. JLL figures show an average term of nine years during the first quarter and seven years by 4Q2020, reflecting, perhaps, some lingering uncertainty about longer commitments.

As they navigate the post-pandemic office landscape, real estate professionals will likely encounter a host of unfamiliar challenges. To manage the road ahead, Spiegel recommends a basic tried-and-true approach.

“Commercial real estate professionals are best equipped to handle market changes when they ask questions and understand the needs of their clients,” he says. “Ask about workplace issues: Is the workforce happy and engaged? The best professionals are those who ask probing questions about how the real estate asset is helping achieve the goals of the tenant and then listen carefully. Ask not just about near-term but long-term changes to the client’s business strategy or challenges that they can address through real estate.”

Source: “Back to the Office?“

Filed Under: All News

The drones are coming, but can they deliver?

June 9, 2021 by CARNM

More logistics firms and retailers are turning to drones for last mile deliveries

The sight of drones dropping parcels in back gardens or balconies is closer than ever as more aviation authorities give trial schemes the green light amid growing interest from retail and logistics players.

Spanish innovator GesDron recently launched a pilot for Europe’s first home delivery drone for food orders in Madrid while Ireland now has drone service Manna delivering groceries, takeaways and medicines in two towns, with plans for rapid expansion in the UK and U.S.

Earlier this year, the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority approved plans for Sees.ai to begin test flights using remote piloting – a significant step forward from previous trials in which drones had to remain in view.

Meanwhile, 16 public and privately owned organisations in Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark just backed an initiative to probe the efficient use of airspace for drones.

Europe’s efforts mirror those in the U.S., where the likes of logistics firm UPS and Amazon have been piloting schemes following approval from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.

A fast-changing space

While still some way off mass adoption, drones have huge potential to transform the logistics sector as technology advances at speed and consumer demand for convenience grows, says Ashley Smart, EMEA logistics development director at JLL.

Indeed, research firm MarketsAndMarkets predicts the glocal market for drone delivery will grow from $528 million in 2020 to $39 billion by 2030.

“There has, and continues to be, progress on the research and development side and those technological advances have stimulated governments to come up with new rules and regulations, which of course differ from country to country,” he says. “But it’s only recently that we are starting to see some steps made by third party logistics providers (3PLs).”

The UK’s Royal Mail is now trialing drone deliveries for the first time to deliver letters and Covid-19 testing kits to the Isles of Scilly.

Over in the U.S., retailer Kroger is following in the footsteps of Walmart by running its own pilot drone schemes to deliver groceries in as little as 15 minutes.

Drone technology itself is also evolving with a new German model from Wingcopter capable of delivering three parcels in one go.

“All things point towards greater use but there are a few challenges to overcome for it go further,” says Smart.

From concerns over safety and privacy in low lying airspace to energy efficiency, drone delivery is not quite ready for large-scale commercial take-off just yet.

But efforts such as the Nordic Drone Initiative – where several countries with common regulatory areas have come together – could speed things up, Smart believes.

Homes for drones

Back on the ground, warehouses will also need to adapt to manage a steady flow of drone deliveries.

“How those 3PLs factor in drones will play a big part in their success – but it’s also about futureproofing warehouses, which have historically gone through little change in terms of their configuration over the years,” says Smart. “Buildings will need to accommodate drones in just a few years’ time if technical and regulatory progress continues at its current pace.”

Incorporating charging points, roof hatches or sky lights, or more space outside for drone landing pads, may not only mean altering warehouse design but rethinking picking and packing operations, as well as shipping methods.

“3PLs more used to dispatching multiple items will be switching to single items being sent out individually – that alone is a big change to overcome given traditional delivery methods,” Smart says.

Royal Mail’s delivery process, for example, involves an un-crewed aerial vehicle carrying up to 100kg of mail to an airport. From there, a smaller drone takes deliveries to dedicated points.

“And of course, urban areas will also need to rethink their current airspace regulations,” says Smart, pointing to the city of Madrid’s stipulation that currently restrict drones from built-up areas.

But drones are clocking up the miles in more remote locations; France’s La Poste has a small-scale drone delivery service up and running with drones transporting packages up to the village of Mont-Saint-Martin in the Alps.

The cost of scaling up may raise questions over financial feasibility – and damage to and a loss of drones over time could alone prove to be prohibitive. But as Smart points out, drones were always more likely to play a supporting rather than main role in the delivery process.

“They’re on their way now and the level of discussion among supply chain players has risen,” says Smart. “With more trials underway, the coming months will give us more clarity as to how big a delivery role drones can actually play in future logistics networks.”

Source: “The drones are coming, but can they deliver?“

Filed Under: All News

How One Investor is Mitigating the Surge in Materials Costs

June 9, 2021 by CARNM

Working with a proactive general contractor is essential.

Rising materials prices are becoming a bigger and bigger issue in real estate.

In a May 2021 survey for the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), 90% of builders report shortages of appliances, framing lumber and OSB. And Marcus & Millichap’s John Chang, in a recent investor outlook video, said that materials prices have skyrocketed this year, with lumber up by 90% and steel and copper up 50%. Overall materials are 17.2% over the norm.

Dr. Masaki Oishi, co-founder and chairman of MarketSpace Capital, says the situation with lumber prices is the worst he has ever seen. But there are ways to combat these materials increases and shortages.

“There are several strategies that we’ve used in the past,” Oishi says. “A lot of it is actually driven by the general contractors that we tend to use.”

Oishi says the three key ingredients to a project are time, materials and labor. “It’s really important to build relationships with contractors who have the experience, the know-how and the connections to make sure that the projects can get done and get done in a timely manner,” he says. “That is so fundamental.”

Oishi says a good general contractor will work with their client and give them ways to save on time,  if not necessarily save money on materials. “If we can finish a project a week or two earlier, that’s a big savings in and of itself,” he says. “So there are ways in which we can help each other to keep costs under control.”

Oishi says these contractors anticipate needs ahead of time and either procure materials or have contracts to purchase them at a certain price. “So they’re locked in to some degree,” Oishi says.

But sometimes more imagination is required. “In some cases, we’ve actually had to get a little creative and substitute other materials—like using teel frames instead of using wood—or there are other ways to get around using one particular type of material,” Oishi says.

An experienced general contractor and a creative approach can help a developer overcome some hurdles with materials shortages.

“A combination of working with a general contractor that has a lot of experience and all the connections that are necessary to get the project done, along with some creative planning, is one way in which we try to keep costs from spiraling out of control,” Oishi says.

Even with material and labor shortages, things could be worse. While there is an appetite for multifamily, single-family and industrial projects, other sectors are facing headwinds. That should limit starts for things like office and hotel projects.

“There is a real problem with demand in some of the sub sectors of the real estate market, like office space,” Oishi says. “People are still in their home office. Also, in terms of retail, there is still a big, strong trend towards more and more e-commerce.”

Source: “How One Investor is Mitigating the Surge in Materials Costs“

Filed Under: All News

An Abundance Of Liquidity

June 8, 2021 by CARNM

Debt funds, construction finance, office lending. There is seemingly no end to the capital markets’ largeness these days but some caveats are in order.

Just two years ago, Starwood Property Trust told its shareholders about its first foreclosure on a loan that was net leased to a single grocery tenant that filed for bankruptcy. The 440,000-square-foot distribution center had a loan balance of $17 million, CFO Rina Paniry reminded shareholders on a more recent call for the first quarter of 2021. “Over the past two years, we leveraged the Starwood platform to release and market the property, Paniry said. The property was sold this quarter for $31 million, “a very successful outcome for our shareholders.”

A pandemic intervened in the middle of that process, of course, and grocery stores in general have proven to be resilient to the worst of economic trends. Nevertheless, Paniry’s news speaks volumes about lending in general for commercial real estate these days: times are good even as we battle the (hopefully) last vestiges of Covid-19. And by extension, funding is abundant, coming from both established players and new entrants alike.

Starwood Property Trust, for example, originated $2.2 billion across 12 loans for an average loan size of $184 million for the quarter. These were offset by $1.1 billion in loan repayments, bringing its commercial lending portfolio to a record $11.2 billion at quarter end, according to Paniry.

Even distressed and special situation borrowers can often find the necessary capital to complete deals, thanks to a plethora of funds lined up for this very purpose. To name one example: Earlier this year Machine Investment Group, which focuses on opportunistic, distressed and special situations investments across the US, provided a $208 million recapitalization of a hospitality portfolio located in Hollywood, CA.  With the package, sponsor Relevant Group is now completing the construction of the two hotels by this summer.

A Bountiful Picture

A year ago, it was a vastly different picture. The pandemic, it had become obvious, would not be clearing up by summer or fall. Furthermore, its effect on the commercial real estate industry was unclear, especially with the office asset class. In response, many of the traditional commercial real estate debt providers, including life insurance companies, slowed down their lending pace. Underwriting got significantly tighter.

The situation could not be more different today. “They are hitting it full force this year,” says Brian Stoffers, global president of debt and structured finance for capital markets at CBRE. “The banks, especially the big money center banks, pulled back for three or four months. Now, they’re hitting it big.”

Even the office sector, whose future is admittedly still unclear, is attracting funding. Boston Properties, for example, recently announced a $2-billion joint venture with two unnamed sovereign wealth funds to target this asset class.

The investment venture will help Boston Properties better compete for opportunities in its core markets, which remain competitive, according to comments CEO Owen Thomas made during the REIT’s first quarter earnings call. The REIT and its partners will commit up to $1 billion each and have the opportunity to invest one-third of the equity in each identified deal at their discretion.

“We believe this venture, with approximately $2 billion of investment capacity, provides us the financial resources and return enhancement to be an even more nimble and competitive participant in the acquisitions market,” Thomas said.

In addition to the traditional players, newcomers are also entering the space. “The big new entries are really these different debt funds,” Stoffers says. “I think investors are looking at risk-adjusted returns. And they’re saying, ‘You know, in this low-rate environment, these debt funds are offering pretty decent yields. And in most of their lending, there’s an equity slug on top of what they’re giving them in the way of debt.’”

Given the environment, Stoffers says these funds are viewed as a good, risk-adjusted bet by investors. “They’re out there, and they’re out there in big numbers,” he says.

This is an issue that Berkadia has been following through its debt fund tracker. As of early May 2021, Berkadia recorded close to 130 different debt funds, according to Hilary Provinse, executive vice president and head of mortgage banking at the company.

“Those are either private equity, debt fund vehicles or some operators who have raised funds where they’re investing either preferred equity or debt into different parts of the stack,” Provinse says. “So there’s just a ton of liquidity on the debt funds.”

For office assets with tenancy issues, debt funds will typically provide the reserves and work with the borrowers. “It’s not across the board, but the money is coming back to the office,” Stoffers says.

Even if they’re working at home one or two days a week, Stoffers says people are coming back to the office. “Therefore, lenders are doing more and more in the way of office financing,” Stoffers says.

Stoffers says the situation is similar in retail. While essential retail has done well throughout the pandemic, strip centers and restaurants are coming back.

“We’re finding money for nearly all forms of retail right now,” Stoffers says. “It might be a little more expensive money [for retail], but there is money out there.”

In the hotel space, there is also plenty of money available. “We’re very active in the hotel space right now from an equity and a debt perspective,” Stoffers says. “There is no shortage of capital for hotels. We do think that the convention hotels are going to take the longest to return. But some of the drive-to destinations are doing incredibly well.”

With all of this competition in the debt market, buyers are benefitting. Stoffers says loan-to-values are higher at the margins and spreads are lower. Treasury’s underlying index for longer-term fixed-rate deals has gone up.

“The floating rates indexes haven’t really moved much,” Stoffers says. “That’s where they’re getting aggressive on the cost of the money. It is not so much with the underwriting because there is so much equity out there. Borrowers aren’t having trouble raising equity. Lower loan-to-values is not an issue.”

Chasing Fewer Deals, Certain Assets

The picture is not completely rosy, of course. Perhaps most worrisome for borrowers is that a good bit of this capital is only looking for certain types of deals.

“As we get adjusted to a new world and from what we see in the Fed space, in particular, there is a lot of capital chasing essentially fewer product types of asset classes,” says John Hofmann, commercial production team leader for KeyBank. “What you have is a slight supply-demand imbalance.”

US sales volumes fell 32% versus 2019, according to Real Capital Analytics. And, in January, RCA showed a 58% decrease in year-over-year transaction volume. “All of us in the debt capital markets rely on assets trading hands,” Hofmann says. “And the transaction activity is more muted. But we expect that to pick up here very shortly.”

Hofmann says sponsors in the asset classes that were more resilient to COVID are “getting incredible terms—better terms than they were getting pre-COVID.”

“We see a lot of demand for multifamily, industrial and self-storage.”

“Multifamily, industrial and self-storage continue to be our favorite asset class in terms of where they are now versus pre-COVID.”

Hofmann also notes that debt providers prefer acquisitions. “If it’s a new transaction at a new basis, we see a lot of demand for that,” he says. “Where you see less demand is on refinance and those other asset classes [retail and hospitality], but they are starting to come back,” Hofmann says.

Despite the recovery, Hofmann says lender investment committees are tightly scrutinizing harder-hit asset classes. “I think everyone’s investment committees now are tougher,” Hofmann says. “I think they’re harder.”

As part of this process, Hofmann says people are focused on tenant health. “People are asking different questions,” Hofmann says. “It’s focused on the collections, the tenant financials and I think most importantly, the resiliency of the cash flow coming out of COVID.”

Another area where lenders are trying to be cautious is new construction. This, of course, has always been the case—since there are any number of risks that could delay or even halt development, including securing entitlements, labor or materials, lenders understandably require more from borrowers on ground-up development.

But in this market, where multiple players are offering debt for apartment projects, lenders are finding they have to get a little more competitive.

“Typically banks’ construction lending is usually at 60%, 65% or maybe 70% [loan to value], says Steve Rosenberg, CEO of Greystone. “However, a borrower just came to us looking for 90% construction financing. They got it. It wasn’t from us, but they got it. We’ve almost never seen that before.”

Looking at that one anecdote, it might appear that developers need to put less skin in the game to build new apartment projects. But that doesn’t mean lenders are necessarily making irrational decisions.

Despite an increase in new groups coming in and providing debt, Rosenberg doesn’t see any flashing red lights, at least not in multifamily construction. “I am not seeing anyone doing anything where I shake my head and say, ‘Well, this is really idiotic,” Rosenberg says. “I’m not seeing that, but you can see where lenders are pushing the envelope. Do I see a yellow light there? I don’t know. It doesn’t feel like it. I’m not seeing unsafe lending. I’m not seeing anything like we saw in the subprime market.”

Still, there are some concerns about development costs that could threaten projects.

“They are putting some of the properties that were going to be constructed on the sidelines,” Rosenberg says. “So no question about it. Costs are going up and the equity may not be able to achieve the yields that it needs to in order to move ahead.”

The issue may be even more critical on affordable housing projects where margins are already tight. “We even see it on the affordable side,” Rosenberg says. “Those deals are pretty tight, and with the increase in construction costs, we definitely see some projects that don’t work now.”

Rosenberg is excited about some construction financing products out there, particularly loans from the Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy program. These loans help commercial real estate owners make energy efficient, water conservation and renewable energy improvements to their buildings. Greystone is launching a C-PACE division for these loans.

“I’m very excited about [C-PACE loans] because obviously, we want to promote energy efficiency and green investments,” Rosenberg says. “I like the idea of the C-PACE where a property owner can assess themselves a tax and essentially finance it because it has a priority lien in front of the first mortgage. You can raise capital at a relatively low cost of funds. And C-PACE can be used for potentially 20% to 30% of the capital stack on new construction.”

Debt Sources Abound for Multifamily

But if lenders have doubts about certain types of new construction and the office asset class, there is no hesitation on their part for multifamily.

Fundamentals in the multifamily asset class have largely recovered from the pandemic in terms of leasing and rent growth. Lenders have taken note, not that they ever completely abandoned this favored asset class.

“We’re definitely seeing the economy opening up and the asset classes that we’ve participated in, particularly on the multifamily side, valued as high as ever,” Rosenberg says. “Multifamily pricing has not come down at all. It has become even more of a global asset class than it was before.”

That popularity is attracting capital from all corners. “We’re seeing even more sources of capital coming in, and we’re having to compete harder and get even more aggressive and creative,” Rosenberg says. “The asset class itself is a hot asset class. We’re seeing a lot of capital chasing it.”

The terms on loans are also getting better for borrowers. “If anything, we’re going up the capital stack to compete better,” Rosenberg says.

Rosenberg says there was an expectation that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would focus on affordable housing and become less aggressive in the market-rate business. And, in the process, their credit box would become even tighter. But that hasn’t materialized.

“They started out that way [backing off], but the reality is they haven’t been able to achieve the volumes that they anticipated achieving,” Rosenberg says. “So we’re seeing even those boxes opening up a little bit.”

While it is mainly the same players competing on the permanent side, a host of new entrants have entered the bridge space. And, existing asset managers are allocating more capital to the multifamily asset class.

“On the bridge and repositioning financing, the competition is coming from individuals or entities that are asset managers,” Rosenberg says. “So whether it’s a Blackstone or an Apollo, everyone has got a transitional loan program these days.”

REITs are even jumping into the bridge lending space. “We’re even seeing large, publicly traded real estate ownership companies coming to market with a debt product,” Rosenberg says. “It’s not a long-term debt product. Everyone wants to get some additional yield. So we’re seeing traditional owners utilizing their cash to make loans.”

REITs can take advantage of the arbitrage between what they’re paying in their dividend and what they’re earning on bridge loans.

“If their average cost of funds is 2.5% or 3% and they can lend money out at 6% or 7%, that’s huge,” Rosenberg says. “It makes a lot of sense. They know the asset class because they’ve been on the equity side of it. So they understand the assets and they’ve got easy access to cheap capital. Why shouldn’t they participate? It makes a lot of sense.”

The net effect of all of this competition is better terms for borrowers. “Sometimes it’s good to be a lender,” Rosenberg says. “Other times, it’s good to be a borrower. This is one of those times where it’s pretty good to be a borrower.”

A New Type of Private Equity

One interesting development in the midst of all this liquidity is the fairly new trend of developers turning into private equity providers as well.

One recent example is Al. Neyer, a 125-year-old commercial real estate development and design-build firm, which just closed its first real estate investment fund. The company has raised $110 million from 105 investors and expects to fund $300 million in class-A industrial projects.

“Until now, Al. Neyer would raise equity on a project-by-project basis,” according to a spokesperson. “Over the past several years, the company has experienced explosive growth, becoming 100% employee-owned in 2014 and expanding to Nashville in 2015 and Raleigh in 2019.”

The firm has a pipeline of 20 projects that could mean as much as 12 million square feet of industrial space, given the demand from e-commerce and manufacturing. Neyer expects to “deploy all the equity within 12 to 18 months, and plan to launch additional funds once all equity is deployed.”

Neyer isn’t the only real estate with a burgeoning private equity arm. Boundary Cos., a Bethesda, MD-based firm founded in 2014, recently revealed having closed its first investment fund. Although Boundary didn’t disclose the amount of the fund, it did say it expected to undertake $300 million in investments.

Although firms raising their own money isn’t “uncommon,” Peter C. Lewis, chairman of Wharton Equity Partners, says, “You are seeing a little more traction.” One reason is financial self-interest for both the real estate firms and investors. Without private equity middlemen, the business gets more of the profit and limited partners have less investment dilution.

Projects like those of Neyer and Boundary are likely to be attractive because of their targeted nature. “Investments must also be very focused on sectors that are likely to outperform,” Paul Getty, CEO of First Guardian Group, says. “Both of these funds are targeting very hot sectors—last mile distribution centers and storage, which can also be a type of distribution center for smaller retailers and mom and pop entrepreneurs.”

“Real estate operators are getting smarter,” Lewis says. “They’re coming to the conclusion that it’s better to do this in house.”

But if they can’t, there is a world of capital waiting to accommodate them.

Source: “An Abundance Of Liquidity“

Filed Under: All News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Search Property
  • Join CARNM
  • CARNM Login
  • NMAR Forms
  • All News
  • All Events
  • Education
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Issues/Concerns
6739 Academy Road NE, Ste 310
Albuquerque, NM 87109
admin@carnm.realtor(505) 503-7807

© 2026, Content: © 2021 Commercial Association of REALTORS® New Mexico. All rights reserved. Website by CARRISTO